Shankar Kumar @ Shankar Paswan v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.45752 of 2018 ======================================================

1. Shankar Kumar @ Shankar Paswan S/o Pappu Paswan R/o VillageThegua, P.S. Fatuha, Distt. Patna. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Subodh Kumar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sir Pramod Kumar Pandey ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 07-08-2018 Heard the parties.

The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Fatuha P.S.Case No.115/18 , registered for offences punishable under Sections 147, 341, 323, 504, 379 and 354 of the Indian Penal Code.

Allegation against the petitioner is and other accused persons is of assault to the informant and against this petitioner there is specific allegation of snatching of gitia. Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that the allegation is ornamental in nature and the petitioner has no criminal antecedent.

Heard learned A.P.P. also.

Having heard both sides and in view of the facts and circumstances, as stated above, let the petitioner, above named, in

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.45752 of 2018 (2) dt.07-08-2018 2/2 the event of arrest or surrender before the court below within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of the order, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate Ist Class, Patna City in connection with Fatuha P.S.Case No.115 of 2018 dated 28.2.2018, subject to condition as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

With following conditions :

(i) One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned court.

(ii) The petitioner will not induce any witness or tamper with the evidence.

(iii) The petitioner shall co-operate in the investigation of the case and make himself available as and when required by the Police, otherwise, the prosecution is free to move for cancellation of his bail bond. With the aforesaid direction, this application is allowed. (Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) chn/- U T