Krishna Chaudhary v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.70446 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-111 Year-2025 Thana- RANIYATALAB District- Patna ====================================================== Krishna Chaudhary S/O Budhan Chaudhary R/O Vill. and P.S.- Rani Talab, Dist.- Patna ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Ashok Kumar Mishra, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Bharat Bhushan, A.P.P For the informant : Mr. Surya Prakash Singh, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 19-12-2025 Heard learned counsels for the petitioner, informant and the State.

2. Petitioner apprehends arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 109, 352, 351(2), 351(3), 3(5) and 103(1) of B.N.S.

3. As per prosecution case, eight named accused persons including this petitioner assaulted informant and her father-in-law by means of lathi and iron rod as a result of which father-in-law of the informant sustained injury and died.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that on the alleged date, sudden quarrel arose between the parties on a trivial issue of tying buffalo in front of the temple which led to the alleged occurrence, in which, both sides sustained injuries. Case and counter case. He further submits that post-mortem report falsifies the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.70446 of 2025(2) dt.19-12-2025 2/2 prosecution case, because as per F.I.R, altogether 8 persons assaulted father-in-law of informant with various weapons, but in the postmortem report, only two injuries have been found on the person of deceased. There is no specific overt-act against this petitioner. Similarly situated co-accused have already been allowed bail by this Court vide order passed in Cr. Misc. No. 63443 of 2025. Petitioner claims clean antecedent.

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State and learned counsel for the informant vehemently opposed the bail application.

6. Considering the nature of accusation, this anticipatory bail is allowed and it is ordered that let the above named petitioner in the event of his arrest/surrender before the court below within a period of eight weeks from today, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Judicial Magistrate 1st Class, Danapur in connection with Rani Talab P.S. Case No. 111 of 2025, subject to condition as laid down under Section 482(2) of B.N.S.S (Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) vashudha/- U T