Mohan Yadav And ORS v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.3621 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -117 Year- 2016 Thana -MANJHI District- SARAN ======================================================

1. Mohan Yadav, Son of Late Ram Pravesh Yadav, Resident of VillageDumari, P.S.- Manjhi, District- Saran (Chapra).

2. Rajakaliya Devi, Wife of Shiv Govind Yadav, Resident of VillageDumari, P.S.- Manjhi, District- Saran (Chapra).

3. Durga Devi, Wife of Krishna Yadav, Resident of Sasrao, P.S.- Asao, Distt- Siwan.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Vitesh Kumar Singh For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Kumar Ranjit Ranjan ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PRIYA ORAL ORDER 24-11-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State. The petitioners apprehend arrest in Manjhi P.S. Case No. 117 of 2016 instituted for the offence under Sections-304B, 201/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

It has been submitted that these petitioners are family members of husband of the daughter of the informant. From the written report, it appears that there is general and omnibus allegation against these petitioners. In such circumstances, prayer for anticipatory bail is allowed and it is ordered that the petitioners named above in the event of their arrest or surrender in the court below within six weeks from the date of receipt/production of copy of this order, shall be released on bail

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.3621 of 2017 (3) dt.24-11-2017 on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each in connection with Manjhi P.S. Case No. 117 of 2016 to the satisfaction of learned Additional Chief Judicial MagistrateV, Saran at Chapra subject to condition as laid down u/S 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. with further conditions (1) bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned, (2) petitioners shall cooperate in the trial and shall be present on each and every date fixed by the court and absence on two consecutive dates without proper and reasonable reason, will automatically cancel bail bond of the petitioners and (3) if petitioners tamper with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioners.

(Sanjay Priya, J) A.K.V./- U T