Patna High CourtCR. MISC./76023/2024dismissed

Bhusan Ravidas v. The State Of Bihar

2024-12-13Mr. Justice Anjani Kumar Sharan2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.76023 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-464 Year-2020 Thana- RAHUI District- Nalanda ====================================================== Bhusan Ravidas S/O Late Keshar Ravidas R/O Village- Rahui, Post- Rahui, P.S- Rahui, Distt- Nalanda, Bihar.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Gaurav Kumar Verma For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Nawal Kishore Prasad ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 13-12-2024 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner seeks bail in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 147, 148, 149, 341, 323, 307 and 302 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. As per the prosecution case, the allegation against the accused persons including the petitioner is that they entered the house of the informant with weapons and brutally assaulted the informant's wife and other members due to which his wife sustained injury and died during treatment.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence and has falsely been implicated in this case. He submits that there is an inordinate delay of 42 days in lodging the present F.I.R., which

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.76023 of 2024(2) dt.13-12-2024 2/2 makes the prosecution doubtful itself. He further submits that the petitioner is languishing in custody since 29.08.2024. The petitioner has no criminal antecedent as mentioned in para-3 of this application.

5. Learned APP for the State opposed the prayer for bail.

6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and the fact that the petitioner is the main assailant, this Court is not inclined to grant regular bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, the prayer of regular bail of the petitioner is hereby rejected in connection with Rahui P.S. Case No. 464 of 2020.

7. However, the petitioner shall be at liberty to renew his prayer for bail after framing of charges. (Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) anand/- U T