Ved Prakash Singh v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.47333 of 2018 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -117 Year- 2015 Thana -MADANPURA District- AURANGABAD ====================================================== Ved Prakash Singh, Son of Late Bhuneshwar Prasad Singh Resident of Village - Darmi Kala, P.S. - Tandawa, District - Aurangabad (Bihar). .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar.

.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ajay Kumar Sharma, Advocate. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Harendra Prasad, A.P.P. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PRIYA ORAL ORDER 29-08-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in Madanpur P.S. Case No. 117 of 2015 instituted for the offence under Sections 147, 148, 149, 121(A), 386, 120(B) of the Indian Penal Code and Section 17 of C.L.A Act.

Counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner was not apprehended on spot.

In the written report it is alleged that on 20.08.2015 informant got information that meeting of MCC is going to be held at Lahanga Sthan Jangal. The police party went there and saw five persons climbing on the mountain. They started running away on seeing the police party. Three persons were apprehended by the police and two persons managed to flee away.

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.47333 of 2018 (2) dt.29-08-2018 2/2 Apprehended accused disclosed the name of petitioner as Vikash Jee, but the correct name of petitioner is Ved Prakash Singh. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner is allowed. In the event of surrender/arrest of the petitioner, named above, within six weeks from today, in connection with Madanpur P.S. Case No. 117 of 2015, he shall be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Aurangabad, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) Cr. P.C.

with further conditions (1) bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned, (2) petitioner shall cooperate in the trial and shall be present on each and every date fixed by the court and his absence on two consecutive dates without proper and reasonable reason will be liable to cancel his bail bond and (3) if petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner.

(Sanjay Priya, J) S.Ali/- U T