← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./74324/2023bail granted

Chhotu Kumar Singh @ Chhotu Singh @ Ajeet Kumar Singh @ Ajit Singh v. The State Of Bihar

2023-11-29Mr. Justice Sandeep Kumar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.74324 of 2023 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-237 Year-2021 Thana- MAGADH MEDICAL COLLEGE District- Gaya ====================================================== CHHOTU KUMAR SINGH @ CHHOTU SINGH @ AJEET KUMAR SINGH @ AJIT SINGH son of Ram Naresh Singh Village- Mahadev Bigha Rauna Ps- Belaganj Dist- Gaya ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Priya Ranjan For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Anil Prasad Singh Mr. Jharkhandi Upadhyay ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR ORAL ORDER 29-11-2023 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

2. The petitioner is in custody since 10.08.2023 in connection with Magadh Medical P.S. Case No. 237/2021 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 325/341/307/120(B)/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act. Later on, Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code was also added.

3. As per the prosecution case, one Jitendra Kumar hired criminals and got the deceased killed brutally. The petitioner is also said to have been a part of the crime.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case. He further

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.74324 of 2023(2) dt.29-11-2023 2/2 submits that there is no evidence against the petitioner. He next submits that the petitioner has not been put on T.I.P. till date.

5. Learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing on behalf of the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for bail.

6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner above named be released on bail after framing of charge, on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Judicial Magistrate, 1st, Gaya in connection with Magadh Medical P.S. Case No. 237/2021.

7. If there is delay in framing of charge because of non-appearance of the other accused, the trial Court will separate the trial of the petitioner and frame the charges against him.

(Sandeep Kumar, J) Saif/- U T