← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./40684/2017disposed

Alkumi Bano @ Chando Bibi And ANR v. The State Of Bihar

2019-07-17Mr. Justice Dinesh Kumar Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.40684 of 2017 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-550 Year-2015 Thana- SHASTRINAGAR District- Patna ====================================================== 1.

Alkumi Bano @ Chando Bibi, W/o Akhtar Ali, 2.

Heena Tabassum @ Heena Ali @ Hena Tabassum, D/o Akhtar Ali, Both R/o Mohalla- Samanpura, P.S.- Shastrinagar, District- Patna. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State Of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Manish Kumar No-2 For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Sri Ashok Kumar Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 17-07-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State.

The petitioners have renewed the prayer for anticipatory bail in connection with Shatrinagar P.S. Case No. 550 of 2015 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 326, 307, 498A, 304B of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 3⁄4 of Dowry Prohibition Act, pending in the Court of learned ACJM, Patna.

Considering the statement of the victim to the effect that petitioner no. 1, being the mother-in-law, poured kerosene oil and petitioner no. 2, being th sister-in-law lit fire, this Court earlier rejected the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioners since the accusation is being corroborated by the statement of

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.40684 of 2017(2) dt.17-07-2019 2/2 the landlord of the victim recorded in paragraph no. 9 of the case diary.

It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioners that petitioner no. 2 is an unmarried girl and the child of the victim has alleged nothing against petitioner no. 2. Considering the fact that after going through the case diary, the earlier order was passed, this Court is not inclined to revise the earlier order.

Let the learned Court below consider the prayer for regular bail of petitioner no. 2 without being prejudiced by the order of this Court keeping in view the fact that petitioner no. 2 is an unmarried girl.

Accordingly, this application is disposed of. (Dinesh Kumar Singh, J) DKS/- U T