Pintu Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.67070 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-122 Year-2018 Thana- LAUKAHI District- Madhubani ====================================================== PINTU YADAV, Son of Raj Narayan Yadav, Resident of Village - Kakardov, P.S.- Laukahi, District- Madhubani ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

THE STATE OF BIHAR ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Hriday Narayan Harshit For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Rajendra Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. KUMAR ORAL ORDER 10-12-2019 Heard learned counsel for the parties.

Petitioner seeks bail in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 147, 148, 149, 341, 323, 324, 307, 379, 504 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code. Informant has alleged that FIR named accused variously armed with lathi and khanti assaulted the informant and her family members causing injury to them. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that allegation against the petitioner is assaulting Santosh Kumar Sah, husband of the informant by iron rod on his head. Injury report of Santosh Kumar Sah has been enclosed as Annexure 3 in which nature of injury has been found to be simple. It has further been submitted that there is land dispute between the parties. Petitioner has got no criminal antecedent and similarly

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.67070 of 2019(3) dt.10-12-2019 2/2 placed co-accused persons have already been granted bail by this Court by order dated 30.09.2019 passed in Cr. Misc. No.51570 of 2019 and Cr. Misc. No.48841 of 2019. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner named above be released on bail upon furnishing bail bond of Rs. 20,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned court below where the case is pending in connection with Laukahi P.S. Case No. 122 of 2018, with following conditions:- (1)Bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned.

(2) Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be properly represented on each and every date fixed by the court and shall remain physically present as directed by the Court and his absence on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his bail bond shall be cancelled by the court below.

(3) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner.

(S. Kumar, J) Sanjay/- U T