Satish Thakur @ Ashish Kr. @ Ashish Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL APPEAL (SJ) No.4470 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-110 Year-2019 Thana- TEKARI District- Gaya ====================================================== SATISH THAKUR @ ASHISH KR. @ ASHISH KUMAR Son of Ganesh Thakur Resident of Village-Chiraili Tola Pukki Bag, P.S.-Tekari, DistrictGaya. ... ... Appellant/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Appellant/s :

Mr.Arvind Kumar Singh For the Respondent/s :

Mr.Binay Krishna ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJEEV RANJAN PRASAD ORAL ORDER 29-11-2019 Heard learned counsel for the appellant and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

The appellant is seeking anticipatory bail in connection with Tekari P.S. Case No. 110 of 2019 registered under Sections 147, 148, 149, 341, 448, 323, 504, 307 and 379 of the Indian Penal Code and under Section 3(i)(r)(s) of SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, pending in the court of learned Exclusive Special Judge, SC/ST Act, Gaya.

It appears from perusal of the case diary that much before filing of the present appeal police has completed investigation and has submitted a charge-sheet against the present appellant. As per allegation, the appellant had assaulted the informant with a sword which had caused injury on the hand

Patna High Court CR. APP (SJ) No.4470 of 2019(3) dt.29-11-2019 2/2 of the informant. Since there are materials present on record to connect the appellant with the present case, I am not inclined to grant privilege of anticipatory bail to the appellant. Prayer for anticipatory bail of the appellant is rejected.

In case, the appellant surrenders and prays for regular bail in the court below within a period of four weeks from today, his prayer for regular bail shall be considered by the court below on it's own merit without being prejudiced by the order of this court keeping in view that all other co-accused have been granted privilege of anticipatory bail and the injury allegedly caused by the appellant is said to be simple in nature. (Rajeev Ranjan Prasad, J) Rajeev/- U T