Md. Jawed @ Rehan v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.72660 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-50 Year-2022 Thana- AMNAUR District- Saran ====================================================== MD. JAWED @ REHAN S/O MD. FIRDOS ALAM Resident of villageChak Sikandar P.S.- Bidupur, District- Vaishali. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Vijay Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Suman Kumari Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL KUMAR PANWAR ORAL ORDER 02-05-2023 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

The petitioner has prayed for bail in connection with a case registered for the offence punishable under sections 414, 467, 468, 471, 120(B)/34 of the Indian Penal Code and sections 25(1-b)a, 26 and 35 of the Arms Act.

As per allegation in the FIR, during patrolling, police signaled a scorpio to stop but on seeing the police party petitioner and other accused person started to run away. On these petitioner was apprehended by the police officials, and on search, one country made pistol loaded with three live cartridges, one magazine with three cartridges and a mobile phone from the possession of the petitioner. It is further alleged that on asking about the documentary proof in respect of

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.72660 of 2022(3) dt.02-05-2023 2/2 vehicle, they could not produce a chit of paper, from which it transpired that the alleged vehicle is stolen one. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case. Petitioner was sitting in the capacity of passenger and he was not aware about the fact that arms were kept in the alleged vehicle. Petitioner is languishing in judicial custody since 21.2.2022.

The application for bail is opposed by learned APP for the State and submitted that petitioner has two criminal antecedents.

Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned CJM Saran at Chapra in connection with Amnour P.S. Case No. 50 of 2022.

(Sunil Kumar Panwar, J) sushma/- U