Bajrangi Singh @ Bajrangi Patel v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.1362 of 2023 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-566 Year-2022 Thana- BHABHUA District- Kaimur (Bhabua) ====================================================== BAJRANGI SINGH @ BAJRANGI PATEL Son of Late Kalindar Singh Resident of Village - Bhadari, P.S.- Bhabhua, District - Kaimur. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Pawan Kumar Singh For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Shailendra Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL KUMAR PANWAR ORAL ORDER 06-07-2023 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, informant and learned APP for the State.

The petitioner has prayed for regular bail in a case instituted for the offence under Sections 452, 376, 511, 354, 354(A), 354(B), 354(D), 506 of the Indian Penal Code, Sections 8/12 of the POCSO Act and Sections 67, 67A of the I.T. Act. As per prosecution case, , when the informant's youngest daughter was alone in her house, the petitioner entered in her house and outraged the modesty to the informant's youngest daughter. It is further alleged that the petitioner snapped several nude photographs of the victim and threatened to viral it on social media. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case due to old dispute. He has committed no offence. The police recovered the mobile photo from the petitioner containing Sim Card, which is not the alleged

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.1362 of 2023(4) dt.06-07-2023 2/2 mobile number and nothing objection articles has been found by the police. There is no material on record to show that the alleged mobile no. and petitioner's mobile no. have been used for threatening and got viral the nude photographs of the victim to social media of sent to victim's brother. There is no any physical misbehave, abuse/harass and assault by the petitioner to the victim. He is languishing in judicial custody since 01.09.2022.

The application for bail is opposed by learned APP for the State and learned counsel for the informant.

Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case as well as period of custody, this court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Court concerned in connection with Bhabhua P.S. Case No. 566 of 2022.

(Sunil Kumar Panwar, J) arish/- U T