Guddu Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.74951 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-180 Year-2024 Thana- JAMUI District- Jamui ====================================================== 1.

Guddu Yadav S/O Lito Yadav R/O Village- Ujhandi, P.S- Jamui, Distt.- Jamui.

2.

Rajan Yadav @ Rajan Kumar S/O Shivnandan Yadav R/O Village- Ujhandi, P.S- Jamui, Distt.- Jamui.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Pankaj Kumar Sinha, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Arun Kumar Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL DUTTA MISHRA ORAL ORDER 22-11-2024 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.P.P. for the State.

2. Petitioners apprehend their arrest in connection with Jamui P.S. Case No.180 of 2024 instituted under Sections 448, 341, 323, 354B, 354, 379, 504, 506/34 of the I.P.C.

3. As per prosecution case, the petitioners along with other co-accused persons entered the house of the informant, molested and assaulted her. It is further alleged that they have taken away Rs.30,000/-and a chain made of gold from the neck of the informant.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.74951 of 2024(3) dt.22-11-2024 2/3

4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners are innocent and have falsely been implicated in this case due to land dispute. Earlier a case was lodged against the nephew of the informant by bhabhi of co-accused Sikandar Yadav and due to that reason this case has been filed with false allegations. The allegations are ornamental in nature. There is no injury to anyone. It is further submitted that similarly situated co-accused persons, namely, Santosh Yadav @ Sanjeev Kumar and Sikandar Yadav @ Sikandar @ Sakinder Yadav have already been granted anticipatory bail by this Court vide order dated 23.10.2024 passed in Cr.Misc.No.73028 of 2024. Petitioners undertake to cooperate in the investigation and the trial.

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail.

6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and submissions of learned counsel for the parties, in the event of arrest or surrender before the Court below within six weeks from today, the petitioners be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Jamui in connection with Jamui P.S. Case No.180 of

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.74951 of 2024(3) dt.22-11-2024 3/3 2024, subject to the conditions as laid down in Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973.

(Sunil Dutta Mishra, J) Harish/- U T