Sanni Kumar v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.71818 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-86 Year-2025 Thana- TIKAPATTI District- Purnia ====================================================== Sanni Kumar Son of Surendra Yadav Resident of Village - Dhusar, Post office - Tikapatti, Police Station -Tikapatti, Dist. - Purnia. ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Rakesh Kumar Jha, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Jagdhar Prasad, A.P.P.
====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 15-10-2025
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.
2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 310(2) and 311 of the BNS.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is a person with clean antecedent and the informant alleges that on 11.06.2025, at 02:30 a.m., while he was taking rest on his tractor with maize loaded when five unknown accused came and looted him of his articles including Rs.3,500/- and even took the keys of the tractor and left him after tying his hands and legs.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that FIR is against unknown and the name of the petitioner transpired in the confessional statement of apprehended accused, namely,
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.71818 of 2025(2) dt.15-10-2025 2/3 Nitish Kumar in police custody which does not have any evidentiary value in the eye of law. It is further submitted that petitioner is a person with clean antecedent and co-accused, namely, Om Kumar, from whose house 213 bags of corn was recovered, had approached this Court seeking anticipatory bail by filing Cr. Misc. No. 68297 of 2025 and the same was allowed by an order dated 24.09.2025 passed by a learned Coordinate Bench of this Court. It is next submitted that petitioner will not abscond rather will cooperate in the investigation to prove his innocence.
5. Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner.
6. Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, let the petitioner above-named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned trial court within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty-five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court where the case is pending/Successor Court in connection with Tikapatti P.S. Case No. 86 of 2025, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482(2) of the BNSS.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.71818 of 2025(2) dt.15-10-2025 3/3
7. One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be his father, namely, Surendra Yadav.
8. However, if the investigating officer of the case files an application before the learned trial court bringing to its notice that petitioner despite giving assurance to this Court is not cooperating in the investigation, the learned trial court shall be at liberty to cancel the bail bonds of the petitioner. (Satyavrat Verma, J) Kundan/- U T