Patna High CourtMJC/1138/2017dismissed

Sumitra Devi v. The State Of Bihar Through Sri Dr. Deepak Prasad, The Principal Secretary Planning And Development,

2018-09-13Mr. Justice Rajeev Ranjan Prasad2 pages

Patna High Court MJC No.1138 of 2017 (3) dt.13-09-2018

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.1138 of 2017 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 22068 of 2013 ====================================================== Sumitra Devi Wife of Vijay Kumar Singh, Resident of Village+ P.O.- Karshahia, P.S.- Dhaka, District- East Champaran at Motihari. ... .... Petitioner

Versus

1. The State of Bihar through Sri. Dr. Deepak Prasad, the Principal Secretary, Planning and Development, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.

2. Sri. Arbind Kumar Choudhary, the Principal Secretary Department of Panchayat Raj, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.

3. Sri Anupam Kumar, the Collector, East Champaran, Motihari.

4. Sri Sunil Kumar, the District Panchayat Raj Officer, East Champaran, Motihari.

5. Sri Birendra Kumar, the Land Reforms Deputy Collector, Sikharana, Dhaka, East Champaran, Motihari.

6. Sri Manoj Kumar Rajak, the Sub Divisional Officer, Sikharana, Dhaka, East Champaran, at Motihari.

7. Sri Pankaj Kumar Jha, the Circle Officer, Dhaka, East Champaran at Motihari.

8. sri K.N. Singh, the Executive Engineer, Ashthaniya Kshetra Abhinantran Sangathan, Karya Pramandal- 2, Pakridyal, East Champaran, at Motihari.

.... .... Respondents ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Nagendra Kumar Singh For the Respondent/s : Mr. Aag6- Pushkar Narain Shahi ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJEEV RANJAN PRASAD ORAL ORDER 3.

13-09-2018 There is no mandamus in the order of the learned writ court. While declining the relief prayed in the writ application the writ court had permitted the petitioner to avail the remedy before any other appropriate forum in accordance with law.

Patna High Court MJC No.1138 of 2017 (3) dt.13-09-2018 In such circumstances, this contempt application cannot proceed, and is dismissed accordingly. (Rajeev Ranjan Prasad, J) Rajeev/- U