Santosh Yadav v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.75229 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-13 Year-2019 Thana- JHAJHA District- Jamui ====================================================== SANTOSH YADAV Son of Dasarth Yadav Resident of Kudila, P.S.-Gidhour, District-Jamui.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Satya Prakash Parasar For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Amitesh Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHA SARTHY ORAL ORDER 18-12-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.
The petitioner has filed the instant application for grant of bail in connection with Jhajha P.S. Case No. 13 of 2019 (District-Jamui) registered for the offence punishable under section 394 of the Indian Penal Code.
As per the allegation in the FIR, the vehicle of the informant was overtaken, he was forced to stop and to switch of his light. He was looted of Rs. 64000/- cash, mobile phone and other articles. Thereafter, it is stated that of the four accused persons who robbed him, two persons were thin and tall and two persons were of short height. All persons were aged about 25 -30 years.
It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.75229 of 2019(4) dt.18-12-2019 2/2 that on being implicated in another case on the basis of his confessional statement in that case the petitioner has been remanded in the instant case. Besides confessional statement of the petitioner before police, there is no other material against him. He has not been put on T.I. Parade. There is no recovery from his possession, he is in custody since 9.7.2019 and chargesheet has been submitted in the case.
The application for bail was opposed by learned APP for the State.
Having heard learned counsel for the parties and taking into consideration the fact that the investigation has concluded with submission of chargesheet, the petitioner has not been put on T.I. Parade and there is no recovery of any incriminating article the Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. Let the petitioner above named be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Sub Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Jamui in connection with Jhajha P.S. Case No. 13 of 2019 (District-Jamui).
Bibhash/- (Partha Sarthy, J) U T