← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./75526/2024bail granted

Abinash Kumar @ Dablu @ Dablu Mandal v. The State Of Bihar

2025-01-21Mr. Justice Prabhat Kumar Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.75526 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-233 Year-2024 Thana- SABAUR District- Bhagalpur ====================================================== 1.

Abinash Kumar @ Dablu @ Dablu Mandal Son of Gopal Mandal Resident of Village -Teghra, PS- Haweli Kharagpur, District- Munger 2.

Chandani Devi Wife of Abinash Kumar @ Dablu @ Dablu Mandal Resident of Village -Teghra, PS- Haweli Kharagpur, District- Munger 3.

Ayush Kumar Son of Abinash Kumar @ Dablu @ Dablu Mandal Resident of Village -Teghra, PS- Haweli Kharagpur, District- Munger ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioners :

Mr. Ashok Kumar No.6, Advocate For the State :

Mr. Madan Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 21-01-2025 Heard learned counsels for the parties.

2. The petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 366A, 504, 506 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. As per prosecution case, co-accused Ankit Kumar kidnapped daughter of informant for the purpose of marriage. When the informant enquired from parents of co-accused Ankit Kumar, they abused and threatened with dire consequences.

4. It is submitted by learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners that thrust of accusation is against coaccused Ankit Kumar. Petitioners have falsely been implicated in this case merely because Petitioner No. 1 is father, Petitioner No. 2 is mother and Petitioner No. 3 is brother of co-accused

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.75526 of 2024(3) dt.21-01-2025 2/2 Ankit Kumar. There is no specific or direct allegation against these petitioners. Petitioners claim clean antecedents.

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioners.

6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, nature of accusation and clean antecedents of the petitioners, the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioners is allowed.

7. Accordingly, in the event of arrest/surrender within a period of eight weeks from today, let the above named petitioners be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned C.J.M., Bhagalpur, in connection with Sabour P.S. Case No. 233 of 2024, subject to condition as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) shashank/- U T