Dinesh Sah v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.65104 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-361 Year-2019 Thana- BEGUSARAI TOWN District- Begusarai ====================================================== Dinesh Sah, Male, aged about 52 years, Son of late Bijo Sah, Resident of Village - Bishan Pur, P.S.- Town, Distt - Begusarai. ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Shubhesh Pandey, Advocate For the State :
Mr.Humayou Ahmad Khan, A.P.P.
====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 05-11-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.
The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Town P.S. Case No. 361 of 2019 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 457, 380 of the Indian Penal Code. Petitioner is Proprietor of a Jewelry. Allegation is that stolen ornaments were seized from the Jewelry of the petitioner. Petitioner is remanded in this case on 07.08.2019. The investigation of the case has already completed. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the recovered ornaments were never put on T.I. Parade. In the facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner above named be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 20,000/- (twenty thousand) with two sureties of the
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.65104 of 2019(2) dt.05-11-2019 2/2 like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Begusarai in connection with Town P.S. Case No. 361 of 2019, subject to the following conditions :
(1) One of the bairlors will be his own blood relative, preferably, father, mother, brother, sister and/or his wife.
(2) The petitioner shall not indulge himself in any similar offence till conclusion of the trial.
(3) The petitioner shall remain physically present in court on each and every date during trial and in the event of failure on two consecutive dates without sufficient reasons, his bail bonds shall be liable to be cancelled by the learned court concerned.
(4) The petitioner shall co-operate with the investigation, if not already concluded and make himself available and when so required and in case of failure, the State shall be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail. (Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) Nasimul/- U T