Brahmadeo Yadav v. The Union Of India And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Letters Patent Appeal No.966 of 2017 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 15128 of 2015 ===================================== Brahmadeo Yadav, S/o Late Baldeo Gope, resident of Tarachak, P.O. and P.S. Danapur Cantt., District - Patna - 801503.

.... .... Appellant/s

Versus

1. The Union of India through the Secretary of Defence, New Delhi.

2. The Presiding Officer, Central Govt., Industrial Tribunal No. 2, Dhanbad in the State of Jharkhand.

3. The Regional Labour Commissioner, Ministry of Labour, Govt. of India, 2nd Floor, Maurya Lok Complex, Patna.

4. The Chief Executive Officer, Cantonment Board, Danapur Cantonment, District - Patna.

5. The President Cum Brigadier Cantonment Board, Danapur Cantonment, District- Patna.

6. The General Officer, Command in Chief, Hq. Central Command, Lucknow Cantonment, Kariappa Road, Lucknow 226002.

.... .... Respondent/s ===================================== Appearance :

For the Appellant/s :Mr. Gautam Kr. Kejriwal, Advocate Mr. Alok Kr. Jha, Advocate For the UOI :Ms. Nivedita Nirvikar, Advocate ===================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHUTOSH KUMAR

Patna High Court LPA No.966 of 2017 (4) dt.03-10-2018 2/2 ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE) 03-10-2018 Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the appellant has stated at the Bar that in view of the death of the original writ-petitioner, the present Letters Patent Appeal has become infructuous.

Under the circumstances, he seeks permission to withdraw the present Letters Patent Appeal.

Permission is, accordingly, granted.

The present Letters Patent Appeal is dismissed as withdrawn as having become infructuous.

(Mukesh R. Shah, CJ) (Ashutosh Kumar, J) Praveen-II/Shageer U