Md. Sakir Ansari v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.50626 of 2018 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -18 Year- 2018 Thana -RAMPUR CHAURAY District- JEHANABAD ======================================================

1. Md. Sakir Ansari son of Md. Salim Ansari resident of village - Abgilla, P.S. Rampur Chauram, District - Arwal.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Rajendra Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Yogendra Kumar Singh, A.P.P. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 31-08-2018 Heard the parties. The petitioner seeks anticipatory bail in connection with Rampur Chauram P.S. Case No. 18 of 2018, registered for offences punishable under Sections 341, 323, 307, 337 and 379/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

As per F.I.R., allegation against the petitioner along with other co-accused dragged and assaulted the informant with tangi on the head of the informant and also assaulted to the brother of the informant with lathi- danda, causing injuries and snatched Rs 30,000/- .

Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case and there is vague and general allegation against the petitioner. It is also

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.50626 of 2018 (2) dt.31-08-2018 2/2 submitted that there is no specific allegation against the petitioner and there is land dispute between the parties and the petitioner has no criminal antecedent.

Learned A.P.P. opposes the prayer for bail.

Having heard both sides and in view of the facts and circumstances, as discussed above, let the petitioner, above named on surrender or arrest within six weeks be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Arwal in connection with Chauram P.S. Case No. 18 of 2018, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) of Cr.P.C. with condition that one of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned court.

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) Sudha/- U T