Ranjeet Kumar @ Ranjeet Yadav @ Ranjeet Kumar Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.6745 of 2023 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-153 Year-2022 Thana- JAMUI District- Jamui ====================================================== 1.

RANJEET KUMAR @ RANJEET YADAV @ RANJEET KUMAR YADAV SON OF BACHHU YADAV R/O VILLAGE- SARARI, P.S.- JAMUI, DISTRICT- JAMUI 2.

HIRA YADAV SON OF LATE TRVENI YADAV R/O VILLAGE- SARARI, P.S.- JAMUI, DISTRICT- JAMUI ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

THE STATE OF BIHAR ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Amrendra Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Md. Ataur Rahman, A.P.P.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 24-05-2023 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.P.P. for the State.

The petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 341, 323, 324, 354, 307, 504 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code. The informant alleges that on the date of occurrence the accused persons including the petitioners came to the house of the informant and Hira Yadav with Khanti assaulted on his head and thereafter Ranjeet Yadav assaulted by an iron rod causing injury on head of the informant.

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners are persons with clean antecedent and are agnates of the informant, it is next submitted that petitioners have been

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.6745 of 2023(2) dt.24-05-2023 2/2 falsely implicated in the present case, it is further submitted that from perusal of the Injury Report it would manifest that there is only one injury on head and the doctor has opined the injury to be simple. The learned counsel next submits that even presuming what has been alleged is true without admitting then the blow was not repeated and the injuries are simple in nature though alleged to have been caused on the vital part of the body. Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioners.

Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioners, the petitioners above-named, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned trial court within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Jamui P.S. Case No. 153 of 2022 subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C.

(Satyavrat Verma, J) GauravSinha/- U T