Ram Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.70911 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-257 Year-2025 Thana- DHAMDAHA District- Purnia ====================================================== Ram Kumar S/o Barun Yadav R/o vill - Khanuwa, P.s.- Dhamdaha, Distt.- Purnea.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar.

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Pawan Kumar Singh, Advocate.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Suresh Prasad Singh, APP.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL DUTTA MISHRA ORAL ORDER 08-10-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

2. The petitioner seeks regular bail in a case registered under Section 30(a) of Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act.

3. As per prosecution case, there is recovery of 87.810 litre illicit foreign liquor from Tractor bearing Registration No. BR-39GA-9397 and 30.870 litre illicit foreign liquor from Jute field, in total 118.680 litre illicit foreign were recovered and the petitioner was apprehended on the spot.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case only on the basis of suspicion. He further submits that the alleged recovery of liquor was made from the jute field which is situated behind the house of petitioner and he has no concern with the said place. Learned counsel submits that petitioner has

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.70911 of 2025(2) dt.08-10-2025 2/2 no concern either with the alleged seized liquor or with the vehicle in question. He further submits that no incriminating article has been recovered from the conscious possession of petitioner. Learned counsel submits that petitioner is a young boy of 21 years who is in custody since 01.09.2025 and he has got clean antecedent. He further submits that there is no likelihood of absconding the petitioner or tampering with the evidence and he undertakes to cooperate in the investigation and trial.

5. Learned APP for the State has opposed the prayer for regular bail of the petitioner.

6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and submissions of learned counsel for the parties, let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Court concerned in connection with Dhamdaha P.S. Case No.257 of 2025.

(Sunil Dutta Mishra, J) Ritik/- U T