Ganesh Yadav v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.72166 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-204 Year-2021 Thana- BHARGAMA District- Araria ====================================================== Ganesh Yadav Son Of Late Vijendra Yadav R/O Village- Rahariya, Ward No. 12, P.S.- Bhargama, District- Araria ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State Of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner :
Mr. Bidhanesh Misra, Advocate For the Opposite Party :
Mr. Uday Chand Prasad, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR ORAL ORDER 04-03-2023 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State.
Let the defect(s), if any, be removed within a period of four weeks from today.
This application has been filed for grant of regular bail arise out of Bhargama P.S. Case No. 204 of 2021, registered for the offences under Sections 341, 323, 302, 504 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code.
It has been submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that similarly situated co-accused has been granted bail by a co-ordinate Bench of this Court in Criminal Misc. Case No. 17099 of 2022 vide order dated 25.07.2022. For the reasons mentioned in the order dated 25.07.2022 passed in Criminal Misc. Case No. 17099 of 2022, this bail application is also allowed.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.72166 of 2022(2) dt.04-03-2023 2/2 Let the petitioner, above-named, be released on bail after framing of charge on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Judicial Magistrate- 1st Class, Araria, in connection with Bhargama P.S. Case No. 204 of 2021, subject to the condition that the petitioner would cooperate in the proceeding of the court below. In the event of failure to appear on two consecutive dates, the court below will be at liberty to pass appropriate order including cancellation of bail bonds of the petitioner.
It is clarified that if the charge has already been framed in the case, the bail bond of the petitioner shall be accepted by the court below.
(Sandeep Kumar, J) Harsh/ U