Patna High CourtCR. MISC./53576/2018disposed

Pramod Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

2018-09-06Mr. Justice Aditya Kumar Trivedi2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.53576 of 2018 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -96 Year- 2018 Thana -CHAKAND District- GAYA ======================================================

1. Pramod Yadav S/o Late Karu Yadav, R/o Vill.- Delli Bigha, P.S.- Belaganj, District- Gaya.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Vinod Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s: Mr. Shailendra Kumar -2, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ADITYA KUMAR TRIVEDI ORAL ORDER 06-09-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned APP.

During course of patrolling, informant got confidential information regarding stealthily preparation of country made wine (Mahua Sharab) by Pramod Yadav (petitioner), Ranjit Chaudhary and Jitendra Chaudhary whereupon, location was raided and during course thereof, three persons managed to escape while items as per seizure list were seized therefrom. It has further been disclosed that on query the seizure list witness identified the persons who succeeded in their escape as Pramod Yadav, Ranjit Chaudhary and Jitendra Chaudhary. It has also been disclosed that the house of Ranjit Chaudhary was searched and during course thereof, six gas cylinders were recovered.

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.53576 of 2018 (2) dt.06-09-2018 It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that nothing has been recovered from his possession. It has also been submitted that he has been named out of villager politics by his enemies and that being so, there happens to be a good case for grant of anticipatory bail.

Learned APP opposed the prayer for bail.

While considering regular bail having been filed on behalf of petitioner, the learned lower court will consider the event that informant was not at all identifying the petitioner since before and had named only on the basis of discloser made by seizure list witness. In terms thereof, instant petition is disposed of. (Aditya Kumar Trivedi, J) perwez U T