← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./39958/2017bail granted

Vickky Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2017-08-22Mr. Justice Vinod Kumar Sinha2 pages

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.39958 of 2017 (2) dt.22-08-2017

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.39958 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -489 Year- 2017 Thana -MOTIHARI TOWN DistrictEASTCHAMPARAN(MOTIHARI) ======================================================

1. Vickky Kumar Son of Late Mundrika Keshri @ Mundrika Sah, resident of Village- Janpul Chauk, P.S.- Motihari Town, District- East Champaran. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Abhishek Kumar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Bal Mukund Prasad Sinha For UOI : Smt. Shail Kumari, CGC ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 22-08-2017 The petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with Motihari (T) P.S. Case No. 489 of 2017, registered for offences punishable under Sections 30(a), 38(1) and 41(1) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016.

Allegation is of recovery of 2.57 liquor of foreing liquor from the possession of the petitioner.

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that he has falsely been implicated in this case and has no criminal antecedent and has remained in judicial custody for more than one month.

Heard learned A.P.P. also.

Having heard both sides, considering the facts and

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.39958 of 2017 (2) dt.22-08-2017 circumstances of the case, the quantity of liquor recovered and also that petitioner has no criminal antecedent and has remained in custody for more than one month, as such, let the petitioner above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 25,000 (Rs. Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Sessions Judge - Cum- Special Judge, Motihari, in connection with Motihari (T) P.S. Case No. 489 of 2017.

It is made clear that if the petitioner again found involved in any of the like offences, in future, prosecution will be free to move for cancellation of his bail bonds.

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) sunil/- U T