Arvind Kumar v. Union Of India
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.16087 of 2025 ====================================================== Arvind Kumar s/o Sri Rajendra Sharma, resident of 448, Nehru Nagar, P. S Patliputra, Dist. Patna ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1.
Union of India to the through the Law Secretary, Govt. of India, Shastri Bhawan, New Delhi-1 2.
Election Commission of India, through Chief Election Commissioner, Nirvachan Sadan, Ashoka Road, New Delhi 110001. 3.
The State of Bihar through the Chief Secretary, Govt. of Bihar, Old Secretariate, Patna.
4.
Rastriya Janta Dal, through its President Sri Lalu Prasad Yadav, 2, Virchand Patel Path, Patna-800001.
5.
Indian National Congress, through its President Mallika Arjun Kharge, AICC Headquarter, Indira Bhawan, 9A Kotla Marg, New Delhi-110002, 6.
Samajvadi Party, through its President Sri Akhilesh Yadav. 18 Copernicus Lane, New Delhi.
7.
Trinmol Congress, through its President Ms. Mamta Banarjee, 30B Harish Chatterjee Street, Kolkata 700026 8.
DMK, through its President Sri M.K. Stalin, 367, Anna Salai, Subbarayan Nagar. Teynampet Chennai, Tamil Nadu 600018 9.
Rastriya Lok Dal, through its President Sri Jayant Choudhary, 12, Tuglak Road, New Delhi-110011 10.
Bhatiya Janta Party through its president Sri Jagat. Prakash Nadda, 6 A, Deen Dayal Upadhyay Marg, New Delhi, 110002 ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Arvind Kumar (In Person) For the State :
Mr. Kinkar Kumar, S.C.-9 For the Union of India :
Mr. Kumar Priya Ranjan, Sr. Panel Counsel Mr. Sudarshan Bharadwaj, Advocate Mr. Sandeep Kumar, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE) 09-10-2025 Perusal of the pleadings in the present petition, in number of pages manual corrections have been carried out in
Patna High Court CWJC No.16087 of 2025(3) dt.09-10-2025 2/2 number of paragraphs which is not readable. That apart, it is clumsy. Therefore, petitioner is at liberty to withdraw the present petition.
2. Accordingly, petition stands dismissed as withdrawn reserving liberty to file fresh petition. (P. B. Bajanthri, CJ) (Alok Kumar Sinha, J) P.K.P./- U