Surjeet Shyamal v. The Union Of India

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.18511 of 2022 ====================================================== Surjeet Shyamal S/o Shivchandra Prasad Navin, Resident of VillageHasanpur Surat, Yadav Chowk, P.S. Patori, District- Samastipur. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The Union of India through Secretary, Ministry of Finance Department, Govt. of India, New Delhi.

2.

The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Finance Department, Old Secretariat, Patna.

3.

The Director General of Police, (Economic Offence Unit) Bihar, Patna. 4.

The District Magistrate, Samastipur, Bihar.

5.

The Registrar, Cooperative Societies, Bihar, Patna. 6.

The District Cooperative Officer, Samastipur. 7.

The Cooperative Extension Officer, Patori, Samastipur. 8.

The Reserve Bank of India, New Delhi.

9.

The Cooperative Extension Officer, Mohanpur, Samastipur. 10.

Sahara India Financial Corporation Limited thorugh its Chairman, Sahara India Bhawan-1, Kapoorthala Complex, Aliganj, Lucknow-226024 (U.P.). 11.

The Managing Director, Sahara Credit Cooperative Society Ltd. Sahara India Bhawan-1, Kapoorthala Complex, Aliganj, Lucknow-226024 (U.P.). 12.

Saharayan Universal Multi Purpose Society Ltd. 195 Zone-1, Maharana Pratap Nagar, Bhopal-462011 (M.P.) 13.

Humara India Credit Co-operative Society, Humanitarian, Mutul-Aid Social Action Association, Kolkata- 700020.

14.

The Branch Manager, Sahara India, Sahpur, Patori, District- Samastipur. 15.

The Officer In-Charge, Patori Police Station, Samastipur. 16.

The Sub-Divisional Officer, Patori, Samastipur. 17.

The Deputy Registrar, Cooperative Society, Bihar. 18.

The Central Registrar, Cooperative Societies, New Delhi. 19.

The Regional Officer, Reserve Bank of India, Bihar, Patna. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mrs. Mahasweta Chatterjee, Advocate For the Respondent/s :

Dr. K.N. Singh, ASG Mr. Amit Prakash, Advocate Mr. Manish Kumar Singh, Advocate Mr. Sarvesh Kumar Singh, AAG-13 ======================================================

2/5 CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHA SARTHY ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE) ===================================================== (The proceedings of the Court are being conducted by Hon'ble the Chief Justice/ Hon'ble Judges through Video Conferencing from their residential offices/residences. Also, the Advocates and the Staffs joined the proceedings through Video Conferencing from their residences/offices.) ===================================== 20-01-2023 Heard learned counsel for the parties.

Petitioner has prayed for the following relief(s):-

3/5

4/5 After the matter was heard for some time, finding the Court not to be in favour of the submissions made across the Bar, learned counsel for the petitioner, under instructions, seeks permission to withdraw the present petition reserving liberty to initiate appropriate proceedings before the appropriate forum, in accordance with law.

Permission granted.

We are sure that as and when any such proceedings are initiated, before the appropriate forum/Tribunal, the same shall be considered and decided expeditiously, in accordance with law.

Needless to add, period for which the petitioner has been pursuing the matter before this Court, shall be excluded for the purpose of computing limitation.

It is made clear that we have not expressed any

5/5 opinion on merits. All issues are left open.

The petition stands disposed of as withdrawn with the liberty aforesaid.

Interlocutory application(s), if any, shall stand disposed of.

(Sanjay Karol, CJ) (Partha Sarthy, J) P.K.P./Amrendra U