Arzoo Ansari @ Chandu v. The State Of Bihar
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.42133 of 2017 (2) dt.12-09-2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.42133 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -230 Year- 2017 Thana -LAHERIASARAI District- DARBHANGA ======================================================
1. Arzoo Ansari @ Chandu Son of Late Md. Israjul Ansari, R/o MohallaKathalbari, P.S.-Lalit Narayan Mithila University (L.N.M.U.), DistrictDarbhanga. .... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Manisha Singh For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Anuj Kumar Srivastava ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 12-09-2017 The petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with Laheriasarai P.S. Case No. 230 of 2017, registered for offences punishable under Sections 363 and 366(A)/34 of the Indian Penal Code.
Allegation against the petitioner is of kidnapping the minor daughter of the informant.
It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the girl has been recovered and her statement under Section 164 Cr.P.C. was recorded in which she has not made any allegation against the petitioner rather she has stated that after quarrel with her mother, she had gone to her friends house. Further petitioner has no criminal antecedent and has been in judicial custody since 19.06.2017.
Heard learned A.P.P. also.
Having heard both sides, in view of the above facts, let
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.42133 of 2017 (2) dt.12-09-2017 the petitioner above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 25,000 (Rs. Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Darbhanga, in connection with Laheriasarai P.S. Case No. 230 of 2017, subject to the following conditions:- (i) One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned Court.
(ii) The petitioner will not induce any witness or tamper with the evidence.
(iii) The petitioner shall cooperate in the disposal of trial and make himself available as and when required by the court and on the event of failure on his part to appear before the court below on two consecutive dates without showing any genuine reasons, the prosecution is free to move for cancellation of his bail.
(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) sunil/- U T