Dinesh Yadav v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.59836 of 2018 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-561 Year-2018 Thana- BARACHATTI District- Gaya ====================================================== Dinesh Yadav Son of Late Gauri Yadav, resident of Village- Hade, P.S.- Mohanpur, District- Gaya.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Sudhir Kumar Sinha For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Narsingh Tanti ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER 27-09-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.
The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case registered under Section 30(d) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016.
The prosecution case, in short, is that 150 kg mahua flower is recovered.
It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner has got no criminal antecedent. There is no allegation of tampering of witnesses alleged against the petitioner. The name of the petitioner has come on the disclosure of co-accused Karu Mandal. Except for this, there is no other substantive evidence to suggest the implication of the petitioner in this case. It is alleged that 150 kg mahua flower is recovered from co-
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.59836 of 2018(2) dt.27-09-2018 2/2 accused Karu Mandal. Nothing incriminating has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. The petitioner had no knowledge regarding the alleged incident. There is no compliance of Section 100 Cr.P.C. On behalf of the State, it is submitted that the petitioner is named in the F.I.R.
Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, let the petitioner, above named, in the event of arrest/surrender before the learned court below within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Special Judge, Excise Act, Gaya in connection with Barachatti (Mohanpur) P.S. case No.561 of 2018, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. (Sudhir Singh, J) Narendra/- U T