Rajeev Raushan v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.71061 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-187 Year-2025 Thana- WARISNAGAR District- Samastipur ====================================================== 1.
Rajeev Raushan S/o Braj Bhushan Prasad R/o Village- Chatneshwar Tara, P.S.- Waris Nagar, District- Samastipur 2.
Raju Raushan S/o Braj Bhushan Prasad R/o Village- Chatneshwar Tara, P.S.- Waris Nagar, District- Samastipur ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioners :
Mr. Suneil Kumar Thakur, Advocate For the State :
Ms. Pushpa Sinha1, APP For the informant :
Mr. Keshav Bhardwaj, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 10-11-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, learned APP for the State and learned counsel appearing on behalf of the informant.
2. Petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 109, 74, 303(2), 352, 351(2) and 3(5) of B.N.S., 2023.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that petitioners are persons with clean antecedent and the informant alleges that accused persons were abusing his son, on protest, Braj Bhushan Prasad gave orders to kill, thereafter Raju caught the son of the informant and Rajiv assaulted him by Garasa causing injury on head, further Rajiv caught informant's
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.71061 of 2025(2) dt.10-11-2025 2/3 daughter-in-law by hair and dragged her inside the boundary and Raju along with other accused assaulted informant's parents and took gold locket of the informant.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that petitioners have been falsely implicated in the instant case by the informant. It is next submitted that the instant FIR is a counter blast to Waris Nagar P.S. Case No.186 of 2025 instituted from the side of the petitioners. It is also submitted that the injury suffered by the injured has been opined to be simple in nature which amply demonstrates that petitioners never had any intention of committing a serious occurrence. It is next submitted that the side of the informant brutally assaulted the mother of the petitioners who was admitted in the PHC from where she was referred to Darbhanga Sadar Hospital but then the petitioners brought her to a private hospital for treatment. It is also submitted that petitioners are not criminals.
5. The learned APP and the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the informant oppose the anticipatory bail application but then are not in a position to rebut the submission of the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners that the injury suffered by the injured is opined to be simple in nature.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.71061 of 2025(2) dt.10-11-2025 3/3
6. Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioners, let petitioners, above-named, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned trial court within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court where the case is pending/Successor Court in connection with Waris Nagar P.S. Case No.187 of 2025, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482(2) of the B.N.S.S. (Satyavrat Verma, J) Sanjay/- U T