Bihar State Cooperative Marketing Union Limited (Biscomaun) v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.18305 of 2022 ====================================================== Bihar State Cooperative Marketing Union Limited (BISCOMAUN) BISCOMAUN TOWER, West Gandhi Maidan, Patna, P.S. Gandhi Maidan, through its Managing Director.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1.
The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Department of Industry, Government of Bihar, Patna.
2.
The Industrial Development Commissioner, Government of Bihar, Patna. 3.
The Bihar Industrial Area Development Authority, Patna through its Managing Director, 1st Floor, Udyog Bhawan, East Gandhi Maidan, Patna800004. 4.
The Managing Director, Bihar Industrial Area Development Authority, Patna, 1st Floor, Udyog Bhawan, East Gandhi Maidan, Patna- 800004. 5.
The Executive Director (Head Quarter), Bihar Industrial Area Development Authority, Patna, 1st Floor, Udyog Bhawan, East Gandhi Maidan, Patna800004. 6.
The Executive Director (North), Bihar Industrial Area Development Authority, Patna through its Managing Director, 1st Floor, Udyog Bhawan, East Gandhi Maidan, Patna- 800004.
7.
The Executive Director (Administration), Bihar Industrial Area Development Authority, Darbhanga Range, Darbhanga- 846004. 8.
The District Magistrate, Madhubani.
9.
The Sub- Divisional Magistrate (Sadar), Madhubani. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Rakesh Kumar Jha For the Respondent/s :
Mr.Yogendra Prasad Sinha ( Aag 7 ) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A. ABHISHEK REDDY ORAL ORDER 18-12-2024 There is no representation on behalf of learned counsel for petitioner when this matter was called on 19.11.2024 and 11.12.2024. Thereafter, it has been specifically posted under the caption 'For Orders'.
2. Even today, there is no representation on behalf
Patna High Court CWJC No.18305 of 2022(16) dt.18-12-2024 2/2 of learned counsel for the petitioner. It appears that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the present writ petition.
3. Having regard to the same, the matter is dismissed for non prosecution.
(A. Abhishek Reddy , J) Gauravkr/- U