Satyendra Bahadur Singh v. The State Of Bihar Through The Principal Secretary, Rural Works Department, Bihar, Patna. And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.2694 of 2017 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 15751 of 2016 ====================================================== Satyendra Bahadur Singh, Son of Late Jagdish Prasad Singh, Resident of Village- Godua, P.S.- Revelganj, Distt- Saran. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar through Sri Vinay Kumar, the Principal Secretary, Rural Works Department, Bihar, Patna.

2. Sri Vinay Kumar, the Secretary Rural Works Department, Bihar, Patna.

3. Sri Kamlesh Chaudhary, the Chief Engineer-3, Rural Works Department, Patna (Visheshwaraiya Bhawan, Bailey Road, Patna).

4. Sanjay Kumar, the Additional Secretary, Establishment, Rural Works Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.

5. Satya Prakash Srivastava, the Superintending Engineer, Rural Works, Circle, Chapra.

6. Sri Ramashish Paswan, the Executive Engineer, Rural Works Department, Work Division, Chapra-1.

7. Sri Ram Chandra Paswan, the Executive Engineer, Rural Works Department, Works Division, Farbisganj.

8. Sanajy Kumar, the Joint Secretary, Rural Work Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.

.... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Mrityunjay Kumar Tiwary, Adv. For the Respondent/s : Mr. Pushkar Narayan Shahi, AAG- 6 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JYOTI SARAN ORAL ORDER 20-06-2018 Heard the parties.

Vide order passed by this Court on the writ petition the Additional Secretary, Rural Works Department, Bihar, Patna was directed to consider the request of the petitioner for stay of his transfer and dispose of the same in accordance with law. On failure of the Additional Secretary, Rural Works Department to comply with the order that the contempt application is filed. A show cause is filed enclosing a reasoned order

Patna High Court MJC No.2694 of 2017 (3) dt.20-06-2018 passed by the Additional Secretary, Rural Works Department bearing Memo No.9506 dated 11.8.2017 at Annexure 'A' rejecting the claim of the petitioner. Should the petitioner not be satisfied by the order then the forum would be other than contempt application and if so advised, he can take recourse thereto.

The contempt application is disposed of accordingly. (Jyoti Saran, J) SKPathak/- U