Mintu Mahto @ Mantu Kumar @ Mintu Kumar Mahto @ Mantu Kumar Mahto v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.49469 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -64 Year- 2017 Thana -BARAULI District- GOPALGANJ ====================================================== Mintu Mahto @ Mantu Kumar @ Mintu Kumar Mahto @ Mantu Kumar Mahto, S/o Bhikhari Mahto, R/o Village- Rupanchhap, P.S.- Barauli, District- Gopalganj.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Lokesh Kumar Singh, Advocate. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Ram Bachan Singh, A.P.P. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PRIYA ORAL ORDER 02-11-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in Barauli P.S. Case No.64 of 2017 instituted for the offence under Sections 341, 447, 323, 324, 307, 379, 427 and 504 of the Indian Penal Code. It is alleged against the petitioner that he assaulted Shankar Mahto on his head with sword.

The injury report of Shankar Mahto has been enclosed as Annexure-3 wherein the Doctor has found sharp cutting injury over his left side face measuring 2" x 1" which is simple in nature. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner is allowed. In the event of surrender/arrest of the petitioner, named above, within six weeks from today, in connection with Barauli P.S. Case No. 64 of

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.49469 of 2017 (3) dt.02-11-2017 2/2 2017, he shall be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate-XIV, Gopalganj, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) Cr. P.C. with further conditions

(1) bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned, (2) petitioner shall cooperate in the trial and shall be present on each and every date fixed by the court and absence on two consecutive dates without proper and reasonable reason will automatically cancel bail bond of the petitioner and (3) if petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner. (Sanjay Priya, J) S.Ali/- U T