Sushma Devi @ Sushila Devi v. The State Of Bihar
This judgment came from a scanned document and its text layer is unreliable — words may be garbled. Check the original PDF before relying on any passage.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.72136 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-33 Year-2022 Thana- MAHINDWARA District- Sitamarhi ====================================================== 1.
SUSHMA DEVI @ SUSHILA DEVI Wife of Ganpat Sahni R/V- Balua, P.Smahindwara, Dist- Sitamarhi 2.
Geeta Devi Wife of Rambabu Sahni R/V- Balua, P.S- Mahindwara, DistSitamarhi 3.
Anandi Devi Wife of Ramchandra Sahni R/V- Balua, P.S- Mahindwara, Dist- Sitamarhi 4.
Rekha Devi Wife of Rajesh Sahni R/V- Balua, P.S- Mahindwara, DistSitamarhi ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Pramod Kumar Sinha For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Rajesh Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 23-12-2022 After some arguments, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the present anticipatory bail application.
Permission is granted.
Accordingly, this application is dismissed as withdrawn. However, if the petitioner surrenders before the learned Court below within a period of eight weeks from today and prays for regular bail, the same shall be considered by the learned Court below on the same day without being prejudiced by this order. (Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) ajay/- U T