Noman Raza Khan v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.71113 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-194 Year-2019 Thana- SIWAN GRP CASE District- Siwan ====================================================== 1.

NOMAN RAZA KHAN Son of Md. Rashid Khan Resident of VillageShahgarh Bahedi, Police Station-Bahedi, District-Bareli (U.P). 2.

Akeel Khan Son of Md. Rashid Khan Resident of Village Shahgarh-Bahedi, Police Station-Bahedi, District-Bareli (U.P). ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Bijay Prakash Singh For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Pushpa Sinha.1 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN ORAL ORDER 11-12-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioners are in custody since 10.09.2019 in connection with Siwan Rail P.S. Case No 194 of 2019 for the alleged offences under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2018.

3. It is submitted that the petitioners have been falsely implicated in connection with the recovery of 35.250 and 32.250 litres of foreign liquor respectively from the possession of petitioner nos. 1 and 2. The petitioners have already suffered more than three months in custody since 10.09.2019. The petitioners claim clean antecedents.

4. Be that as it may, let the petitioners above named be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/-(ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned 2nd Addl. Sessions

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.71113 of 2019(2) dt.11-12-2019 2/2 Judge-cum-Special Judge, Excise, Siwan in connection with Siwan Rail P.S. Case No. 194 of 2019, on the following conditions-- (i) That one of the bailors shall be a close relative of the petitioners.

(ii) That the petitioners shall not indulge in any similar offence till conclusion of the trial. (iii) That the petitioner shall co-operate with the investigation, if not already concluded, and make themselves available as and when so required and in case of failure, the State shall be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail. (iv) The petitioners shall remain physically present in Court on each and every date during trial and in the event of failure on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, their bail bonds shall be liable to be cancelled by the learned Court concerned.

(Vikash Jain, J) HR/- U T