Bhola Sahani @ Bhola Sahni v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.73048 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-191 Year-2024 Thana- NAUTAN District- West Champaran ====================================================== 1.

Bhola Sahani @ Bhola Sahni S/o Sital Sahni R/o Village - South Teluha, Pokhra Tola, Ward No. 7, P.S - Nautan, District - West Champaran 2.

Chhathu Sahni @ Chhathu Sahani S/o Late Bhikhari Sahni R/o Village - South Teluha, Pokhra Tola, Ward No. 7, P.S - Nautan, District - West Champaran 3.

Sunita Devi W/o Bipin Kumar R/o Village - South Teluha, Pokhra Tola, Ward No. 7, P.S - Nautan, District - West Champaran ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Sarvesh Kashyap For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Ram Naresh Ray ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 03-11-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.P.P. for the State.

2. The petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case registered for the offence under Sections 302, 201/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. The prosecution case, in brief, is that on 14.05.2024, informant's daughter was killed and her dead body was burnt or thrown away by the accused persons. These petitioners are alleged to have killed informant's daughter and when informant inquired about the occurrence, the villagers told that his daughter was killed and cremated and all accused persons have fled away.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.73048 of 2025(2) dt.03-11-2025 2/2

4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that petitioner no. 1 & 2 are villagers and petitioner no. 3 is sister-inlaw of the deceased. They are separate in mess and property and have got no concern with the alleged occurrence, but only on the basis of suspicion, they have been dragged in this case. The allegation is general and omnibus.

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail.

6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, let the above named petitioners, in the event of their arrest/surrender within a period of eight weeks from today, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned S.D.J.M., Bettiah, West Champaran in connection with Nautan P.S. Case No. 191 of 2024, subject to condition as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. / Section 482(2) of the B.N.S.S.

(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) anay U T