Ashwini Kumar Choudhary And ORS v. The Uttar Bihar Gramin Bank And ORS
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.15876 of 2017 ======================================================
1. Ashwini Kumar Choudhary, Son of Late Bhupendra Narayan Choudhary, Resident of Mohalla-Budha Colony, adal Bari (Near ITI) P.S. Hajipur, District Vaishali.
2. Mrinal Kant Chatterjee Son of Late Anil KUmar Chaterjee, Resident of Mohalla- B.F.C Plot-04 P.O.Dulmi Nodiha, PS Purulia, District Purlia (West Bengal).
3. Radheshyam Thakur, Sono f Late Nageshwar Thakur, Resident of Mohallla-Indrapuri Colony P.S. Hajipur, District Vaishali.
4. Harishchandra Prasad Sah, Son of Late Bihari Sah, Resident of Mohalla Adalwari, Hathsarganj, P.S. Hajipur, District Vaishali
5. Ragunath Thakur, Son of late Rajeshwar Thakur, Resident of VillageMani Bhakurahar, PS. Hajipur District Vaishali.
6. Jitendra Kumar Srivastava, Son of Saryu Prasad Srivastava, Resident of Mohalla Medanimal Katra, PS. Hajipur, District Vaishali.
7. Anil Kumar Srivastav, Son of Kamakhya Prasad Sinha, Resident of Mohalla Samata Colony Yusufpur, P.S. Hajipur, District vaishali
8. Pramod Kumar, S/o Ramekwal Singh, Resident of Mohalla Bagmali Kharajangi, P.S. Hajipur, District Vaishali.
9. Baleshwar Sah, Sono f Rama Sah, Resident of Mohalla Ward no. 26, Indrapuri Colony, Near R.N. College, P.S. Hajipur, District vaishali. .... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The Uttar Bihar Gramin Bank, through its Chairman Kalambagh Chowk, Sharma Complex, Refugee Colony, Muzaffarpur
2. The Chairma, Uttar Bihar Gramin Bank, Muzaffarpur.
3. The General Manager, Uttar Bihar Gramin Bank, Muzaffarpur.
4. The Senior Manager Uttar Bihar Gramin Bank, Muzaffarpur. .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Mritunjay Prasad Singh, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr. Prabhakar Jha ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT KUMAR SHAH ORAL ORDER 26-02-2018 The learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned counsel for the respondents are in agreement that the present writ petition can be disposed of in terms of the judgment dated 11.01.2016 passed in L.P.A. No.1701 of 2015.
Patna High Court CWJC No.15876 of 2017 (2) dt.26-02-2018 2/2 Since there is no dispute about the present case being covered by the aforesaid judgment dated 11.01.2016, the present petition is disposed of in terms of the judgment dated 11.01.2016 passed in L.P.A. No.1701 of 2015.
(Mohit Kumar Shah, J) N.H./- U