Dipak Kumar @ Dipak Paswan v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.78479 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-708 Year-2024 Thana- JAMUI District- Jamui ====================================================== Dipak Kumar @ Dipak Paswan S/O Jogi Paswan Resident of VillageSinghochak, P.S.- Jamui, Dist.- Jamui ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State Of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Amrendra Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Ms.Renu Kumari, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PURNENDU SINGH ORAL ORDER 03-12-2025 Heard Mr. Amrendra Kumar, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and Mr. Renu Kumari, learned APP appearing on behalf of the State.
2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with Jamui P.S. Case No. 708 of 2024 registered under Sections 191(2),191(3),190,126(2),115(2),118,329(4),109, 303(2),125(a), 125(b),352,351(1),351(2) of the BNS.
3. As per the allegation made in the FIR, the petitioner along with other accused persons assaulted the informant, causing injury to him .
4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is innocent and he has falsely been implicated in the present case. There is case and counter case between the parties. The allegation as alleged
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.78479 of 2025(2) dt.03-12-2025 2/3 against the petitioner is not sustainable in the light of the fact that the petitioner in self defense may have caused some injuries without intention. The petitioner has clean antecedent. On these grounds, the petitioner seeks to be released on pre-arrest bail.
5. Learned APP for the State vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of pre-arrest bail.
6. Having considered the rival submissions made on behalf of the parties, as well as, having perused the content of allegation made in the FIR and the impugned order, I find that there is case and counter case between the parties and the petitioner, in his self-defence, may have caused some injury on the person of the informant, the petitioner is having clean antecedent, I am of the opinion that the petitioner has, prima facie, made out a case to be released on anticipatory bail.
7. The learned District Court is directed to release the petitioner on anticipatory bail, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned District Court within a period of four weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each, to the satisfaction of learned District Court where the case is pending in connection with Jamui P.S. Case No. 708 of 2024, subject to the condition as laid down under Section 482 of the
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.78479 of 2025(2) dt.03-12-2025 3/3 BNSS/438(2) of the Cr.P.C.
8. The learned District Court is directed to verify the criminal antecedent of the petitioner, as stated in paragraph no. 3 of the bail application. If any other case is pending against the petitioner, as what has been stated in paragraph no. 3, this order will lose its force automatically. (Purnendu Singh, J) Ashishsingh/- U T