Patna High CourtCR. MISC./72387/2019allowed

Md. Dilshad v. The State Of Bihar

2020-02-06Mr. Justice Dr. Anil Kumar Upadhyay2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.72387 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-65 Year-2019 Thana- BIRAUL District- Darbhanga ====================================================== MD. DILSHAD Son of late Md. Chhedi Nadaf Resident of Village - Lilhaul, P.S.- Singhia, Distt - Samastipur.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Girish Chandra Jha For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Pawan Kumar Chaurasia ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPADHYAY ORAL ORDER 06-02-2020 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the counsel appearing on behalf of the State.

Petitioner is in custody in connection with Biraul P.S. Case No. 65 of 2019 for the offence under sections 392 of the Indian Penal Code.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has no criminal antecedent.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has been made accused only on suspicion. He is in custody since 10.5.2019.

In the instant case Rs. 5 lakhs was looted by the miscreants.

Considering the fact that petitioner has remained in custody for six months, the Court is inclined to grant bail to the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.72387 of 2019(3) dt.06-02-2020 2/2 petitioner, let the petitioner, named above, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 1,00,000/- (One lakh) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Biraul, Darbhanga, in connection with Biraul P.S. Case No. 65 of 2019. The court below is directed to expedite the trial and conclude the same on day-to-days basis within a maximum period of six months from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order.

In the event, the petitioner is found causing delay in disposal of the trial, the court below shall be at liberty to cancel the bail bond of the petitioner.

(Anil Kumar Upadhyay, J) Ravi/- U T