← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./71197/2018allowed

Anshu Kumar @ Anshu Baba @ Anshu Tiwari v. The State Of Bihar

2018-12-17Mr. Justice Dr. Anil Kumar Upadhyay2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.71197 of 2018 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-285 Year-2018 Thana- PIRO District- Bhojpur ====================================================== Anshu Kumar @ Anshu Tiwari @ Anshu Baba, S/o Arun Kumar Tiwari @ Arun Tiwari, R/o Village- Jamuaon, P.S.- Piro, District- Bhojpur. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar.

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Ravindra Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Sri Shailendra Kumar -2 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPADHYAY ORAL ORDER 17-12-2018 Heard learned counsel for the parties.

Petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Piro PS Case No. 285/2018 for the alleged offence under Sections 384/386 of the Indian Penal Code.

Learned counsel representing the petitioner submits that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent. He is a regular student.

Considering that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent and is a regular student as claimed by the petitioner, the Court is inclined to grant him the privilege of anticipatory bail. This application is accordingly allowed. In the event of arrest or surrender before the concerned court below within a period of one month from today, the petitioner above named is directed to be released on bail on

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.71197 of 2018(2) dt.17-12-2018 2/2 furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bhojpur in connection with Piro PS Case No. 285 of 2018 subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure and on the condition that one of the bailors should be the father of the petitioner and the other should be a teacher who had occasion to impart instructions to the petitioner at any stage. (Anil Kumar Upadhyay, J) mrl./- U T