Ajay Kumar @ Satyendra Turha v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.71152 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-151 Year-2025 Thana- RAXAUL District- East Champaran ====================================================== Ajay Kumar @ Satyendra Turha Son of Late Jagdish Prasad Resident of village - Sheopuri Naga Road Raxaul, P.S.- Raxaul, District - East Champaran ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Abhishek Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Nand Kishore Prasad, A.P.P.
====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RUDRA PRAKASH MISHRA ORAL ORDER 28-01-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.
2. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Raxaul P.S. case No. 151 of 2025 instituted for the offences under Sections 22(b), 25 and 29 of the N.D.P.S. Act.
3. As per prosecution case, the police has recovered Tramadus capsule 6600 pieces, Sampex Capsule 864 pieces, Trarem 100-240 pieces, Nitravet-10 600 tablets, Onrex Syrup 6 pieces of 100 ml each, 5 empty bottles of Blendep Reserve Whisky, Betzeeare-10 100 tablets i.e. intoxicant medicines and syrup from the house of father-in-law of the co-accused Ravi Kumar Gupta.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in the present case due
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.71152 of 2025(4) dt.28-01-2026 2/3 to oblique and ulterior motive. Charge-sheet has been submitted in this case. Petitioner is in custody since 16.09.2025 and has no criminal antecedent. There is no allegation of tampering of witnesses alleged against the petitioner. No incriminating material has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. Even the petitioner was not seen at the place of occurrence. The name of the petitioner has transpired in this case on the basis of the confessional statement of the co-accused Ravi Kumar Gupta recorded before the police which has got no evidentiary value in the eye of law. There is no compliance of Sections 42 and 50 of the N.D.P.S. Act. Learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that other co-accused Manoj Kumar @ Manoj Gupta has been granted bail by this Bench of this Court vide order dated 15.10.2025 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 48665 of 2025. There is also no compliance of Section 103 of the B.N.S.S.
5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioner.
6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, claim based on parity and the period of custody undergone by the petitioner, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.71152 of 2025(4) dt.28-01-2026 3/3
7. Let the petitioner be released on bail, after framing of charge if not already framed, on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.15,000/- (Fifteen thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Court below/concerned Court in connection with Raxaul P.S. case No. 151 of 2025, subject to the following conditions;
(i) One of the bailor(s) shall be the own/close family members of the petitioner.
(ii) The petitioner shall cooperate in the trial and shall be properly represented on each and every date fixed by the court and shall remain physically present as directed by the Court and in the event of failure on two consecutive dates without sufficient reasons, his bail bond shall be liable to be cancelled by the court below.
(Rudra Prakash Mishra, J) manish/- U T