Shaileshwer Sharma v. Sri Arun Kumar Singh, The State Of Bihar Through Its Additional Secretary, Land Reforms And Revenue
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.3625 of 2024 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.11623 of 2023 ====================================================== Shaileshwer Sharma Son of Shivji Sharma, Resident of Village and P.O.- Bela, P.S.- Dariyapur, Distt- Saran (Bihar) 841221. ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1.
Sri Arun Kumar Singh, The State of Bihar through its Additional Secretary, Land Reforms and Revenue Government of Bihar, Patna. 2.
Sri Aman Samir, S/o Not Known, The District Magistrate, Saran. 3.
Sri Mithu Prasad, the Circle Officer, Dariyapur, Saran. 4.
Sahadur Manjhu, Son of Late Manki Manjhi Resident of Village and PostBela, P.S.- Dariyapur, District- Saran (Bihar) 841221. 5.
Dahaur Manjhi, Son of Late Manki Manjhi Resident of Village and PostBela, P.S.- Dariyapur, District- Saran (Bihar) 841221. 6.
Chatu Manjhi son of Late Manki Manjhi Resident of Village and Post- Bela, P.S.- Dariyapur, District- Saran (Bihar) 841221. 7.
Ekadashi Manjhi, Son of Late Manki Manjhi, Resident of Village and PostBela, P.S.- Dariyapur, District- Saran (Bihar) 841221. ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Alok Chandra, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Standing Counsel 25 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY ORAL ORDER 12-09-2025 Heard the parties.
2. The Present Misc. Jurisdiction Case has been preferred for the following relief(s):
issuance of proceeding for contempt against the opposite parties 1a set specially the opposite Party No3,i.e. the Circle officer, Dariyapur, Saran for its wilful and deliberate violation and non compliance of order dated 01/04/2024 passed in
Patna High Court MJC No.3625 of 2024(4) dt.12-09-2025 2/2 C.W.J.C.NO-11623 of 2023 by Ilon'ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Roy.
3. It has been informed by the learned State counsel that the order stands complied, the petitioner also accept the said fact.
4. In that background, the MJC No. 3625 of 2024 is disposed of.
(Rajiv Roy, J) Raj Ranjan/- U T