Patna High CourtCR. MISC./75488/2024bail granted

Ajmeri Khatoon v. The State Of Bihar

2024-10-22Mr. Justice R. P. Mishra2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.75488 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-374 Year-2024 Thana- SUGAULI District- East Champaran ====================================================== Ajmeri Khatoon wife of Late Lal Mohammad Miyan village- singhiya Gumti, Ward no. 3, Ps- Banjariya, Dist- East Champaran ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Manjeet Kumar Mishra, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mrs. Shaheen Begum, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RUDRA PRAKASH MISHRA ORAL ORDER 22-10-2024 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner seeks bail in Sugauli P.S. Case No. 374 of 2024, instituted for the offences punishable under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act.

3. The prosecution case, in short, is that, 60.6 liters liquor was recovered from tempo and the petitioner was apprehended on spot.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in the present case. No incriminating material has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. The petitioner has got no concern with the alleged recovery of liquor. Learned counsel

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.75488 of 2024(2) dt.22-10-2024 2/2 for the petitioner further submits that the petitioner is a lady and she is not the owner of the tempo in question, rather she was a passenger of the tempo and had no knowledge regarding the goods loaded in the vehicle. The petitioner is in custody since 19.08.2024 and has got no criminal antecedent. There is no compliance of Section 100 of Cr.P.C.

5. Learned APP for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioner.

6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case and the period of custody undergone by the petitioner, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner.

7. Let the petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Court below/concerned Court in connection with Sugauli P.S. Case No. 374 of 2024.

(Rudra Prakash Mishra, J) Rajorshi/- U T