Parvesh Manjhi @ Nandu Manjhi @ Nandu v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.69579 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-94 Year-2018 Thana- KASHICHAK District- Nawada ====================================================== 1.

PARVESH MANJHI @ NANDU MANJHI @ NANDU Son of Khelo Manjhi Resident of Village - Bouri, P.S.- Kashichak, District- Nawada 2.

Khelo Manjhi Son of Late Paro Manjhi Resident of Village - Bouri, P.S.- Kashichak, District- Nawada 3.

Bodha Manjhi @ Boudha Manjhi Son of Baleshwar Manjhi Resident of Village - Bouri, P.S.- Kashichak, District- Nawada 4.

Baleshwar Manjhi Son of Late Jhari Manjhi Resident of Village - Bouri, P.S.- Kashichak, District- Nawada ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Sheo Kumar Prasad For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Upendra Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR JHA ORAL ORDER 15-11-2019 Heard both sides.

The petitioners apprehend their arrest in Kashichak P.S. case No. 94/2018 registered under Section 341, 323, 436, 448, 307, 504, 34 of the IPC.

The informant alleged that while he was sleeping in his house and his daughter was sleeping in the courtyard the petitioners set ablaze the house with an intention to burn the informant and his daughter alive. The informant got injuries while taking out his daughter.

The learned counsel for the petitioners submits that all

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.69579 of 2019(2) dt.15-11-2019 2/2 the allegations are false and concocted. Some dispute arose at the time of marriage of daughter of petitioner No.2 and Marwa was constructed inside the courtyard of the house of informant and the same was found burnt but it appears that petitioners set ablaze the Marwa situated inside the courtyard of the house of the informant with an intention to kill the informant and his daughter. The informant in order to put off fire got 35% burn injuries.

Taking into consideration the facts aforesaid, I am not inclined to enlarge the petitioners on anticipatory bail. Accordingly, the same is rejected.

(Prabhat Kumar Jha, J) BKS/- U T