Ram Lakhan Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.71639 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-154 Year-2025 Thana- MOHANPUR District- Gaya ====================================================== Ram Lakhan Yadav S/o- Late Nath Yadav Resident of Village- Sukhdeochak PS- Mohanpur, Dist- Gaya ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Shambhu Sharan Singh, Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mrs.Suman Kumari Singh, A.P.P.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN KUMAR JHA ORAL ORDER 19-11-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

2. In the present case, the petitioner seeks bail in connection with Mohanpur P.S. Case No. 154 of 2025, registered for the offences under Sections 191(2), 190, 126(2), 115(2), 117(2), 109, 351(3) of the BNS.

3. As per the prosecution case, petitioner and other coaccused persons assaulted the informant in the background of earlier dispute.

4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has been falsely implicated in this case. There is land dispute between the parties as the petitioner exchanged his land for the land of the informant. Though the informant has taken possession of the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.71639 of 2025(2) dt.19-11-2025 2/3 land of the petitioner he is not allowing the petitioner to take possession of his land and for this reason, in order to pressurize the petitioner this false case has been lodged. Learned counsel further submits that there is general and omnibus allegation against altogether eight persons however injury report shows only a lacerated wound of size 6cmx0.5cmx0.5cm on mid scalp region and the second injury is a rectangular abrasion on mid back region. The injuries are stated to be simple. Therefore, it is not believable that altogether eight persons assaulted the informant and he received only this type of injury. Learned counsel further submits that the petitioner is in custody since 24.06.2025 and charge sheet has been submitted. The petitioner is having antecedent of two cases and the petitioner is on bail in both the cases.

5. Learned A.P.P. appearing for the State opposes the submission made on behalf of the petitioner.

6. Having regard to the fact and circumstances and submission made on behalf of the parties and considering the general and non-specific nature of allegation against the petitioner and simple nature of injuries of the informant and also considering period of custody of the petitioner and submission of charge sheet, the petitioner is directed to be released on bail,

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.71639 of 2025(2) dt.19-11-2025 3/3 on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand Only) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned A.C.J.M., Shergahti, Gaya/concerned court, in connection with Mohanpur P.S. Case No. 154 of 2025, subject to the condition laid down under Section 480(3) of the BNSS and other following conditions:

(i) One of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioner.

(ii) The petitioner will remain present on each and every date fixed by the court below, if so required by the learned trial court.

(iii) In case of absence on three consecutive dates or in violation of the terms of the bail, the bail bond of the petitioner will be liable to be cancelled by the court concerned.

(Arun Kumar Jha, J) anuradha/- U T