← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/1702/2018dismissed

Prabhat Kumar Sinha v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2018-10-12Mr. Justice Shivaji Pandey2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.1702 of 2018 ====================================================== Prabhat Kumar Sinha, son of Late Madan Mohan Prasad Sinha, Residing at the House of Sri Kripeshwar Prasad, Ward No.-06, Block Colony, Aurangabad, P.O. and P.S. Aurangabad, District Aurangabad (Bihar). ... ... Petitioners

Versus

1. The State of Bihar through the Chief Secretary, Bihar at Patna, New Secretariat (Vikas Bhawan), Bailey Road, Patna, P.S. Patna Secretariat, P.O. Secretariat Post Office, PIN 800015.

2. The Principal Secretary, Department of Panchayat Raj Bihar, Patna New Secretariat Vikas Bhawan, Bailey Road, Patna, Bihar, P.S. Patna Secretariat, P.O. Secretariat Post Office, PIN - 800015.

3. The Director, Directorate of Panchayat Raj, Bihar, Patna, Vikash Bhawan, New Secretariat, Bailey Road, Bihar, Patna, Bihar, P.S. Patna Secretariat, P.O. Secretariat Post Office, PIN 800015.

4. Joint Registrar, Department of Panchayat Raj Bihar, Patna New Secretariat Vikas Bhawan, Bailey Road, Patna, Bihar, P.S. Patna Secretariat, P.O. Secretariat Post Office PIN - 800015.

5. The District Magistrate, Aurangabad Collectorate, Aurangabad, P.O. and P.S. Aurangabad, District Aurangabad, State - Bihar.

6. The District Panchayat Raj Officer, Aurangabad, present posted in Gaya District.

7. The Block Development Officer, Kutumba, P.O. and P.S. Kutumba, District Aurangabad.

... ... Respondents ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Vivekanand Vivek, Advocate For the Respondent/s :

Mr. Kumar Alok- SC-7 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVAJI PANDEY ORAL ORDER 12-10-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.

Patna High Court CWJC No.1702 of 2018(4) dt.12-10-2018 2/2 In this case, the petitioner is only making a prayer to conclude the departmental inquiry initiated against him in terms of the Bihar Government Servant (Classification, Control and Appeal) Rules, 2005.

The State has filed its counter and brought on record the punishment order containing memo no.107 dated 05.07.2018, by which the punishment of censure and deprivation of salary for the period of absence has been inflicted upon the petitioner.

As the departmental inquiry has already been concluded and final order of punishment has been passed, this writ petition does not survive. Hence, this writ petition is dismissed with a liberty to the petitioner to challenge the order of punishment before the appropriate forum.

(Shivaji Pandey, J) pawan/- U