Lukman Ansari v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.73394 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-679 Year-2023 Thana- NARPATGANJ District- Araria ====================================================== Lukman Ansari S/o Haji Jainul @ Late Zainuddin R/o Village- Babuan, P.S.- Ghurna, District- Araria ... ... Petitioner
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner :
Mr. Nadimul Hasan, Advocate For the Opposite Party :
Mr. Yogendra Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HARISH KUMAR ORAL ORDER 19-11-2025 Heard Mr. Nadimul Hasan, learned Advocate for the petitioner and Mr. Yogendra Kumar, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.
2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with Narpatganj (Ghurna O.P.) P.S. Case No. 679 of 2023, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 147, 148, 149, 341, 323, 324, 307, 504, 506 of the Indian Penal Code.
3. While the cousin of the informant had gone to plough his field by tractor, in the meanwhile, co-accused Nazir and Maimul Khatoon resisted to plough the field, which led to commotion, thereafter all the accused persons came there and brutally assaulted the informant and others. It is specifically alleged that this petitioner assaulted one Nizamuddin due to which he sustained a serious injury. There is further allegation against other accused persons of causing assault.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.73394 of 2025(2) dt.19-11-2025 2/3
4. Learned Advocate for the petitioner submitted that admittedly on account of a land dispute, both the parties have entered into a free fight resulting to injuries to persons of both the sides and leading to institution of a counter case being Narpatganj (Ghurna) P.S. Case No. 682 of 2023, which is on earlier point of time. The injury which is sustained to Nizamuddin that has been found to be simple in nature. To support the aforesaid contention, the injury report has been placed on record. The petitioner bears fair antecedent and he undertakes that he will fully cooperate in the proceeding of the court.
5. On the other hand, learned Advocate for the State vehemently opposed the bail application and submitted that the allegation of assault stands substantiated after noticing the corresponding injuries.
6. Having considered the submissions advanced by the learned Advocates for the respective parties and taking note of accusation against the petitioner and corresponding simple injury coupled with the fair antecedent as also the factum of case and counter case, let the petitioner abovenamed be released on bail, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the court below within a period of four weeks from the date of
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.73394 of 2025(2) dt.19-11-2025 3/3 receipt/production of a copy of this order, upon furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Araria, in connection with Narpatganj (Ghurna O.P.) P.S. Case No. 679 of 2023, subject to the conditions laid down in Section 482(2) of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, with the further condition that one of the bailors shall be the own/close family members of the petitioner. (Harish Kumar, J) Pawan/- U T