← Library
Patna High CourtMJC/3712/2017disposed

Vijay Shankar Sharma v. The State Of Bihar,

2019-11-14Mr. Justice Ahsanuddin Amanullah2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No. 3712 of 2017 Arising out of Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 17500 of 2008 ====================================================== Vijay Shankar Sharma, Son of Shri Ram Subhag Sharma resident of Village - Salempur Mathiyan, P.O. - Salempur, P.S. - Sindhwalia, District - Gopalganj. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar, through Sri Vijay Kumar the Secretary, Public Health Engineering Department, Government of Bihar, Bailey Road, Patna. 2.

Sri Vijay Kumar the Secretary, Public Health Engineering Department, Government of Bihar, Bailey Road, Patna.

3.

D. P. Singh, the Engineer-in-Chief, Public Health Engineering Department, Government of Bihar, Bailey Road, Patna.

4.

Raghav G Ram, the Chief Engineer (Mechanical), Public Health Engineering Department, Government of Bihar, Bailey Road, Patna. 5.

M. Nikhil, the Zonal Chief Engineer, Public Health Engineering Department, Muzaffarpur.

6.

R. K. Mahto, the Superintending Engineer, Public Health Circle, Saran at Chapra.

7.

Manoj Kumar, the Executive Engineer, Public Health Division, Gopalganj. ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Arbind Kumar Sharma, Advocate For the State :

Mr. S. Raza Ahmad, AAG 5 Mr. Vishmambhar Prasad, AC to AAG 5 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AHSANUDDIN AMANULLAH ORAL ORDER 14-11-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned AC to AAG 5 for the State.

2. Further affidavit has been filed on behalf of the authorities.

3. From the pleadings and materials on record, the Court finds that the order dated 07.01.2016 passed in CWJC No.

Patna High Court MJC No.3712 of 2017(11) dt.14-11-2019 2/2 17500 of 2008, has been complied with. The same is not disputed by learned counsel for the petitioner.

4. In view thereof, nothing remains in the application and accordingly, the same stands disposed off. (Ahsanuddin Amanullah, J.) P. Kumar U