Patna High CourtMJC/764/2018disposed

Surendra Prasad Yadav @ Surendra Rai v. The State Of Bihar Through The Secretary, Registration Department, Government Of Bihar, Patna And O

2018-09-26Mr. Justice Rakesh Kumar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.764 of 2018 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.19272 of 2014 ====================================================== Surendra Prasad Yadav @ Surendra Rai, Son of Baran Rai, resident of Village- Sunderpur, P.S.- Sursand, District- Sitamarhi. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar through the Secretary, Registration Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.

2. Sri Atul Prasad, The Commissioner, Tirhut Division, Muzaffarpur.

3. Sri Rajeev Raushan, The District Magistrate, Sitamarhi.

4. Sri Nigam Prasad Jwala, The District Sub Registrar, Sitamarhi.

5. Mithilesh Devi, Wife of Late Dina Nath Sah, resident of Mohalla- Pothia Road, Ward No. 8 (Lohapatti), P.S.- Sitamarhi, District- Sitamarhi. ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Sri Anil Kumar Sinha, Advocate For the Opposite Party :

A.C. to G.A. No. 1 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR ORAL ORDER 26-09-2018 Heard Sri Anil Kumar Sinha, learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.C. to G.A. No. 1.

The present petition was filed for initiating contempt proceeding against opposite parties on an allegation of willful disobedience to the order dated- 11.08.2015 passed in C.W.J.C. No. 19272 of 2014.

Learned State Counsel by way of referring to the facts disclosed in the show-cause filed on behalf of opposite party- 3 and 4 on 20th September , 2018 submits that order of writ court has already been complied and in compliance with the order of this court appeal has already been decided.

Patna High Court MJC No.764 of 2018(3) dt.26-09-2018 2/2 Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the order of the appellate court is not in consonance with law. Be that as it may, since in compliance with the order of writ court the appeal has finally been disposed of, there is no reason to further entertain the petition. If the petitioner feels aggrieved with the order of the appellate court, he would be at liberty to avail appropriate remedy.

(Rakesh Kumar, J) praful/- U T