Dinesh Singh v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.68201 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-215 Year-2019 Thana- WARISLIGANJ District- Nawada ====================================================== 1.
Dinesh Singh, Son of Late Dukh Haran Singh Resident of Village - Kochgaon, P.S.- Warsaliganj, District- Nawada 2.
Sudarsan Singh Son of Dinesh Singh Resident of Village - Kochgaon, P.S.- Warsaliganj, District- Nawada ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Devendra Prasad Singh For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Mohammad Sufyan ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJENDRA KUMAR MISHRA ORAL ORDER 18-11-2019 Heard leaned counsel for the petitioners and the leaned A.P.P. for the State.
The petitioners apprehend their arrest in connection with Warisaliganj P.S. Case No. 215 of 2019, registered under Sections 25(b)(a), 26 and 35 of the Arms Act, pending in the court of the learned A.C.J.M-I, Nawada. The accusation is that on receiving secret information about keeping of illicit liquor for supply to the local people in village-Kochgaon by petitioners and three others, the informant along with other Police personnel reached at the house of the petitioner, but the petitioners were not found there. On search of the house, in the southern room at ground floor one country made rifle recovered beneath the bed and on
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.68201 of 2019(2) dt.18-11-2019 2/2 country made pistol along with two live cartridges recovered from eastern room.
Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners submits that petitioners were not found in course of search of house, where one country made rifle and pistol along with two live cartridges are said to be recovered. Having considered the facts and circumstances of the case and the nature of allegation against the petitioners, I am not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners. Accordingly, their prayer for grant of anticipatory bail stands rejected. The petitioners are directed to surrender before the trial Court within four weeks and pray for regular bail, which would be considered by the trial Court in accordance with law without being prejudiced by the order of this Court.
(Rajendra Kumar Mishra, J) manish/- U T