Nirmala Kumari v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.18457 of 2022 ====================================================== Nirmala Kumari W/o Suresh Prasad, Resident of village - Keshochak Ward No. 04, P.O. - Chiksaura Bazar, Prakhand Hilsa, District- Nalanda (Bihar) and presently working as an Incharge Pradhnadhyapak, upgraded Midle School Niriya, Karaiparasurai Prakhand, District - Nalanda. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through its Principal Secretary Education Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.

2.

The Principal Secretary Education Department Govt. of Bihar, Patna. 3.

The Director Primary Education Govt. of Bihar, Patna. 4.

The Director Mid-day-meal Scheme, Bihar, Patna. 5.

The Regional Deputy Director of Education Patna Pramandal, Patna. 6.

The District Education Officer, Nalanda.

7.

The District Programme Officer, Mid-Day- Meal Scheme, Nalanda. 8.

The Block Resource Persons, Mid-Day-Meal Scheme Karai Parsurai, Prakhand, District - Nalanda.

... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner :

Mr. Rama Kant Singh, Advocate For the State :

Mr. Madanjeet Kumar, GP-20 For the Mid Day Meal :

Mr. Girijish Kumar, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 19-11-2024 Heard learned counsels for the parties.

2. This writ application has been filed for quashing the Letter No. 810 dated 16.10.2019 passed by the District Programme Officer, Mid Day Meal Scheme, Nalanda (Respondent No. 7) whereby and whereunder an order of recovery of Rs. 96,985/- has been issued against this petitioner.

3. At the outset, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State raises preliminary objection to the maintainability of

Patna High Court CWJC No.18457 of 2022(2) dt.19-11-2024 2/3 this writ application and submits that petitioner has already filed appeal before the District Education Officer, Nalanda (Respondent No. 6) on 05.12.2019, which is still pending for adjudication.

4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner does not dispute the above contentions.

5. In this regard, the Supreme Court, in the case of Satya Pal Anand versus State of Madhya Pradesh and Others reported in 2016 (10) SCC 767, has observed as follows:- "Pursuance of multiple remedy for same relief before different fora renders the petition nonmaintainable."

6. In the present case, the petitioner has already filed an appeal before the District Education Officer, Nalanda (Respondent No. 6) and the same is still pending for adjudication.

7. In that view of the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, this Court does not thinks it appropriate to interfere in the matter.

8. Accordingly, this writ application is disposed of with direction to the petitioner to pursue the appeal which has already been filed before the District Education Officer, Nalanda

Patna High Court CWJC No.18457 of 2022(2) dt.19-11-2024 3/3 (Respondent No. 6).

(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) shashank/- U